Call for your Health

Risks of Alcoholism?

The disorder is more common in men than in women. In the United States it is estimated that about ten per cent of adult males and about three per cent of adult females are alcoholics. People with alcoholic parents seem to be particularly susceptible, probably because of environmental rather than genetic factors. Some people have symptoms of alcoholism in adolescence or even earlier, but most alcoholics are between 35 and 55.

Alcoholism can affect every system of the body. Although exact figures are not known, it is thought that at least one in five long-term heavy drinkers develops cirrhosis of the liver . Heavy drinking makes the liver particularly susceptible to infection and may cause serious diseases of the stomach, heart and brain. Because alcoholics seldom eat adequately, they are likely to have vitamin deficiencies, particularly vitamin B deficiency . And a pregnant woman who drinks alcohol, whether she is an alcoholic or not, increases the chances of having a mentally retarded or physically deformed baby.

Another danger associated with alcoholism and heavy drinking is traffic accidents. Many injuries and deaths occur on the roads because the judgment of drivers is impaired by alcohol. Alcoholics also are difficult to live with because they are often irritable, and sometimes violent. As a result, the alcoholic risks breaking up his or her family. The same problems of irritability and impaired judgment that affect the alcoholic’s home life and driving skill can also affect job performance, and may result in the loss of a job.

What Should be Done?

If you detect signs of an early stage of alcoholism in yourself, cut down on the amount and frequency of your social drinking for your family’s sake as well as your own. If you find that this is impossible to do, seek help without further delay. Get in touch with a physician or the nearest branch of Alcoholics Anonymous, a world wide organization that has been helpful to many people with drinking problems. If someone close to you shows symptoms of alcoholism but denies that he or she is drinking too much (as alcoholics often do), consult a physician about the problem. You cannot force someone to seek help, but persuasion by a physician, social worker or other professional is sometimes effective.

What is The Treatment?

For treatment to be successful, the alcoholic must recognize the existence of the problem and be determined to grapple with it. The most satisfactory solution, of course, is simply to control your drinking. Unfortunately, total abstinence from alcohol is the only effective solution for many addicts. For people in later stages of alcoholism, an in hospital “drying­out” process is usually necessary. This treatment involves complete abstinence, which often leads to withdrawal symptoms such as hallucinations, seizures, and delirium tremens (commonly known as the DTs). To help you through the most uncomfortable period at the beginning of this process, tranquilizers may be prescribed. You may also be given vitamins if you have a vitamin deficiency.

Psychotherapy is one way of continuing treatment after the initial drying-out period. Probably the most successful treatment is through Alcoholics Anonymous. There are local chapters throughout the country, made up of all kinds of people. In some cases a medication may be prescribed. The alcoholic takes this drug each morning, and this discourages drinking because the combination of alcohol with the drug produces nausea, vomiting and sweating. No such treatment will work, however, unless the alcoholic genuinely wants it to and never “forgets” to take a daily dose.

What are The Long-Term Prospects?

The general outlook for alcoholics depends to a large extent on themselves. If you drink too much, it may be because of nearly unbearable social and business pressures. But if you are determined to give up alcohol, you can.

Smoking is a habit that may take years to quit. It may take great will power on the part of the quitter as the habit is not just a habit; it is addiction to nicotine and tobacco that takes over a person. It is possible that one finds it impossible to quit the habit. For such people, smoking alternatives play a great role in helping them cope with the habit. There are various smoking alternatives that are available as options for people who are trying to quit the habit; the best alternative being the electronic cigarettes. They work on the principle that is very different from the normal cigarettes or cigars.

Electronic cigarettes contain liquid nicotine which vaporizes when the element in the cigarette gets heated up due to inhalation by the smoker. The vapors released give a feel similar to the normal cigarettes and the LED on the outer part of the cigarette gives the appearance of a cigarette burning and indicates its use. The electronic cigarettes have been discovered by scientists in china and have led to a revolution in the smoking habits around the world. The best part of the cigarettes is that they do not leave any residue and still manages to satisfy the smoker and his cravings. Electronic cigarettes are the best smoking alternatives because they are environment friendly too. To get back on the path of a healthy life and to possess a healthy body, one needs to quit smoking and switch over to healthier alternatives.

Breast Cancer Surgery

A biopsy specimen that proves to be malignant means radical surgery – that is, complete removal of the breast, and of adjacent lymph nodes near the armpit and collarbone, and sections of the arm and chest muscles beneath the breast. The surgeon cannot take chances. He must get all of the malignancy to save and prolong his patient’s life.

In the two to five-hour operation, the surgeon usually makes an elliptically­shaped incision and removes the breast and surrounding tissue in a single bloc. This technique is considered less likely to disturb and spread loose cancer cells and it also entails less disfigurement than some of the older procedures.

With sutures and skin grafts, the surgeon is able to close the “window” or incision with a minimum of scarring. As in other surgery, the pink lines of incisions become smoother and paler with the passage of time.

It would be fatuous to minimize the seriousness or complexity of this operation. Patience, delicacy, and great skill are essential. But let the apprehensive woman realize that it constitutes the removal of an external organ only, one which she can forfeit without major organic change or injury to her health or general well-being. The operation is literally superficial (by definition, “on the surface”). No major cavity of the body is invaded or affected .

After Surgery

Following the operation, most surgeons advise treatment of the chest area with x-rays, or one of the new anti-cancer drugs, or both. The purpose of this is to kill any stray cancer cells that might be too deep-seated to be discoverable by any sort of inspection. The whole area where the tumor existed is suspect and no chances are taken.

The so-called “magic bullet” which could destroy cancer cells wherever they hide without harming the normal cells of the body is still a hope of the future. But we do possess drugs which show heartening results against some cancers, notably of the prostate, uterus, and breast . Female breast cancer is classified as a “hormone dependent” type – that is, the rate of growth of existing breast cancer is affected by female hormones, although this is not to say that hormones incited the cancer in the first place. Similarly, cancer of the prostate is affected by male sex hormones. Use of antagonistic hormones (male hormones in breast cancer, female hormones in prostate cancer) or hormone doses and removal of hormone producing organs by castration, has proved to be of considerable palliative benefit in appropriate cases, but is not to be looked upon as a cure, and never as an alternative to recommended surgery.

Unhappily, there are cases of “inoperable” breast cancer disease so far advanced or so widespread that surgery cannot be curative. But even in these cases, drugs now available can usually relieve pain, delay cancer spread, prolong comfortable and useful life. Among such drugs are nitrogen mustard, thiotepa, 5-fluorouracil, and a number of others well known to doctors, and promising new ones emerge from time to time from a vast cancer chemotherapy research program which to date has screened more The left side of the drawing shows lymph channels of the breast area with lymph nodes in the armpit, neck, inner and upper chest areas. The right side of the drawing shows directions of drainage that may carry cancer cells to other parts of the body if treatment of localized breast cancer is delayed. than 75,000 anticancer compounds in animal cancer experimentation.

In some cases, one or another of available drugs has made possible the more effective use of surgery and radiotherapy. Medical journals are filled with case history reports of marked improvement when certain drugs are used with certain

breast cancer patients. Each patient’s needs are of course different and meticulous medical teamwork is necessary in order that the individual patient may have the best therapies in the light of present knowledge.

Behavioral explanations of obesity can be placed into two categories: excessive caloric intake (overeating) and lack of physical activity (hypokinesis).

The basic laws of nature require that calories must be consumed before energy can be stored as excess weight. The body cannot make energy on its own. For the obese and overweight therefore, caloric intake is an important issue.

Do obese people eat more than normal-weight people? This has been a controversial question and researchers are divided in their answer. Numerous studies show that obese people eat no more and sometimes eat less than normal-weight people. These researchers would suggest that blaming obesity on a lack of willpower is inaccurate and an over simplification of the facts. They maintain that the body of the obese person is simply more efficient at converting calories to adipose cells for reasons beyond his or her control, such as genetic predisposition or higher set point for fatness. Stated another way, obese people may not eat more than normal weight people; they just consume more calories than are required by their bodies.

Other researchers claim that obese people do eat more than normal-weight people; the problem is a discrepancy in accurately reporting food intake. In one study obese subjects underestimated food intake by about 50% and overestimated physical activity by 33%. In another study obese women were found to expend and therefore eat about 400 to 500 calories more on average each day than normal-weight women.

Whereas researchers are divided on the issue of overeating, they tend to agree that the abundance of food high in fat and calories is a major factor in the prevalence of obesity in the United States. In his review of the literature on obesity-a review that included 284 citations from the scientific literature Knifeman stated: “Of all the current theories attempting to explain the epidemic of obesity in most Western societies, the high dietary fat intake hypothesis is most widely accepted by experts. Overweight people tend to eat a higher-fat diet than people of normal weight. Ounce for ounce, fat yields more than double the number of calories as protein or carbohydrates . This energy difference partially explains the relationship between dietary fat intake and weight gain. It is not a complete explanation because in studies that hold the total number of calories constant and more calories are consumed than needed, a person eating a high-fat diet tends to store more excess calories as body fat than someone eating a lower-fat diet. Your body is more sensitive to excess carbohydrates than excess fat. Studies conducted in laboratory-type settings (for example, in a respiratory chamber where oxygen is measured, burning calories requires oxygen, more to burn fat, less to burn carbohydrates) show that once the glycogen stores are filled, the body burns carbohydrates first and then stores the fat. We use fat for energy, especially between meals. The brain uses exclusively glucose for energy, but other tissues use fatty acids. Right after meals, all tissues burn glucose.

Excess carbohydrates are converted to glycogen in the liver and muscle. The body can only store a limited amount of glycogen. This is not true for fat. Fat cells are distributed throughout the body. Whereas carbohydrate storage is carefully regulated, fat storage is not, allowing a high degree of expansion. After a large meal, a bit of glucose and amino acids are left over, some of which are used to make fatty acids. This is why the American population has an increasing incidence of obesity on diets high in carbohydrates and excessive in calories. The body’s capacity to make and store fat may have served a useful purpose in earlier times when humans faced the constant threat of famines and an energy reserve meant survival. But now with the sedentary lifestyles of most Americans, glycogen stores are rarely exhausted. The reality for too many people is that they burn carbohydrates and store fat.

Dietary fat also has less of a thermogenic effect than does carbohydrate or protein and can thus be easily stored as adipose tissue. The thermogenic effect of food (TEF) represents the amount of energy required by the body to digest, absorb, metabolize, and store nutrients. The body expends only 3 calories of energy to process 100 calories from fat compared with 25 calories to process 100 calories from carbohydrates. Between 7% and 10% of total body energy goes to support the TEF. For example, after a meal containing 1000 calories, the body uses 70 to 100 calories just to process the meal. The TEF helps to explain why studies consistently show that when adults and children overeat and consume high amounts of dietary fat, they tend to gain weight. Conversely, when the intake of dietary fat is low and the intake of carbohydrate and fiber is high from nutrient-dense foods, desirable body weight is more readily achieved. Cross cultural comparisons confirm the dietary fat-obesity relationship. For example, Americans eat more than twice as much fat as the Chinese, yet the Chinese consume 20% more calories and there is little obesity in China.

Because the energy in carbohydrate stores (glycogen) is very small in relation to that in fat stores, the glycogen can be depleted quickly and frequently. The glucose requirement of the brain, other cells of the nervous system, and a few other tissues provides a stimulus for carbohydrate ingestion. The higher the proportion of fat in the diet, the more total food must be consumed to obtain enough carbohydrates to fill glycogen stores in the muscle and liver.

The high-fat theory of obesity leads to an important question: can a person lose weight by simply focusing on fat calories? In highly controlled studies in which food intake is carefully monitored, researchers found that subjects whose diets contained no more than 20% fat calories lost weight even when there were no restrictions on how much food was eaten. But was the weight loss the result of eating less fat or less calories? The answer seems to be that both fat and calories matter. In controlled studies, when people concentrate on eating less fat they also

Dietary fat promotes fat storage in the body. The body expends only 3 calories to convert an extra 100 calories of dietary fat to storage fat. Fat storage is accelerated if dietary fat is combined with simple sugar in the same meal, such as a ham­burger with a sugared cola drink. Sugar triggers the release of extra insulin. Insulin activates fat cell enzymes that promote movement of fat from the blood to the fat cells. On the other hand, the ingestion of an extra 100 calories of complex carbohydrates requires that the body expend 25 calories to convert it to fat for storage. The conversion process for carbohydrates is more costly than that for fats and provides another reason for reducing fat consumption and increasing carbohydrate consumption.

consume fewer calories and lose weight. This is due to the consumption of mainly nutrient dense foods. Does the same thing happen in real life? Apparently not. Studies of the eating habits of both men and women who consume low-fat products reveal that they often compensate by eating more snack and dessert foods high in sugar but low-fat so the use of low­fat foods becomes an excuse to eat more. The idea that people can eat as much as they want as long as it’s fat free appears to be more fantasy than fact. Although some researchers believe that fat is the main culprit associated with obesity; other experts emphasize that calories count. This helps to explain why Americans are getting heavier with each passing year, even though they are consuming a lower proportion of fat. Increased consumption of low-fat foods by itself does not result in weight loss. Whereas eating low-fat foods is good for health and weight control, eating them in buffet-sized portions isn’t.

Yes, in many instances they do. They also control. Suppose you are undergoing treatment by x-rays for a painful shoulder, shingles, or a similar benign illness. The x-ray tube from which the x-ray beam comes is centered over the affected area and the machine turned on. The treatment may be repeated a number of times, depending on how quickly the condition clears up.

Patients with thyrotoxicosis (an overactive thyroid gland) often are treated to an “atomic cocktail” by the radiologist. The “cocktail” is a carefully determined amount of radioactive iodine. The thyroid gland takes up iodine. When radio­active, this iodine gives off a continuous stream of beta and gamma rays. These rays slow down the overactive thyroid cells and the gland returns to its normal working condition.

Suppose someone you know has a cancerous growth. If his trouble has been discovered in the early stages he has a good chance of being cured. First, the radiologist will learn the patient’s history by talking with the patient and his referring doctor. He also will do his own examination of the patient. Then he will review the report on the tissue, or actually go over the microscope analysis of the small bit of tissue which has been taken from the growth (the biopsy) with the pathologist.

He then develops the plan of radiation treatment best suited for the patient. He maps out a schedule of treatment fit­ting the radiation to the particular growth. He must decide how many treatments given within a certain number of days will deliver the amount of radiation necessary to destroy or control the growth. In many instances, by using many small treatments, it is possible to bombard the growth and the area around it with a large dose of radiation with­out permanently damaging the healthy tissues. This allows them to recover with the least discomfort to the patient.

What do Radiation Treatments Feel Like

There is no sensation during the time the x-rays or gamma rays are being ad­ministered. After two or three weeks of therapy the patient may notice that his skin appears to be sunburned over the treated area. Actually, his “sunburn” is very similar to that which develops from over-exposure to the sun. This reaction in the skin is part of the treatment and will gradually disappear. Perhaps at the same time the patient may also complain of nausea and loss of pep. This is called “radiation sickness.” Fortunately, most patients do not experience this condition. If it does occur, it can be readily controlled. In any event, it will disappear as soon as the series of treatments are over.

The set point theory of weight control also reflects the role of genetics. Proponents of this theory suggest that the body works to maintain a certain weight. More specifically, each person has an internal set point for fatness, sometimes called the a dipostat, that the body seems to regulate by adjusting hunger, appetite, food intake, and energy expenditure. Re­searchers have demonstrated that human and animal subjects who have been put on low calorie or high­calorie diets lose and gain only to a certain level. When the diet ends, food consumption increases and they return to their approximate original weight.

How the body determines its set point is not known. One hypothesis is that the body is able to adjust its energy expenditure by varying how efficiently muscles burn calories. Researchers at New York’s Rockefeller University discovered that a dieter’s metabolism slows down after losing weight, so that doing the same amount of exercise at the new weight burns fewer calories. The researchers found that after losing 10% of their body weight, newly slimmer patients expended 15% less energy than expected for someone of similar size and body composition. The system also works in the other direction; when patients gained weight, their metabolism increased 16%. After a quick weight gain, the metabolism speeds up to make muscle activity burn more calories, quickly bringing the body back to its normal weight-its set point. Whatever direction a person’s weight goes, up or down, losing weight or gaining weight, the body tends to resist that change.

Can a person change his or her set point? Proponents of the set point theory think that the set point does shift over time in response to behavioral factors: eating a high-fat diet tends to raise the set point for fatness and regular physical activity tends to lower it. This shift may be so slight and gradual as to go unnoticed for years.

Some proponents of the set point theory suggest that because some people are genetically programmed to have unwanted pounds, efforts to eliminate fat with diet, exercise, or both are doomed. The body can shut down its calorie-losing mechanism by lowering metabolism and can stimulate appetite to the point that a person must have food.

Other proponents of the set point theory argue that vigorous regular exercise lowers the set point and thereby lowers the level of fat the body will accept and defend. Exercise induces the body to stabilize at a lower body weight, which is precisely what dieters are trying to do. Unfortunately there is no formula for calculating that a specific amount of exercise will result in the loss of a certain number of pounds. Individual response to exercise varies in ways similar to the differences in response to dieting. Still, exercise seems to be the best way to over power the body’s set point. This is a classic case of a genetic inclination being modified through appropriate lifestyle behavior. It supports the idea that heredity (that is, obesity) is not destiny. Living a healthy life-through regular exercise and sound nutritional habits cannot negate heredity, but it can modify it.

In one sense, all laboratory tests are used as a guide to treatment, since they promote accurate diagnosis. In this section, however, reference is made to the use of laboratory tests to select the type of treatment to be used, to determine how much treatment is required, to confirm that the desired effect is being obtained, and to avoid harmful side effects of treatment. The need for tests of this type is greatest in those chronic diseases where treatment must be continued for a long time, perhaps for life.

Tests of Antibiotic Efficacy

In a dangerous infection such as meningitis, it is extremely important to obtain an optimum therapeutic effect without delay. Since meningitis may be due to different bacteria, and each of these may respond differently or not at all to the various antibiotic drugs, it is common practice to test the various antibiotic drugs directly against the bacteria that are present in the particular case. This can be done in the following way:

Spinal fluid from the patient is mixed with melted agar in a sterile dish and the warm mixture is allowed to cool and solidify. Tiny paper disks, each of which has been impregnated with a different antibiotic, are dropped onto the surface of the agar and the dish is set aside for several hours in an incubator. The bacteria that were present in the patient’s spinal fluid begin to multiply and form “colonies” in the medium, except that where they are in contact with the paper disks their growth may be modified by the antibiotic.

If all bacterial growth is suppressed about the paper disk saturated with tetracycline, but growth is abundant about the disk saturated with penicillin, it is clear that tetracycline is a better drug than penicillin to use in the treatment of this particular patient with meningitis. The test is a combination of spinal fluid culture and antibiotic sensitivity.

Dosage Regulation

Probably the oldest use of laboratory tests to regulate drug dosage is in the diabetic patient. Some diabetics have a different requirement of insulin from day to day, depending upon appetite, diet, exercise, colds and the like. If the regular dose of insulin is sufficient, the urine test for glucose will be negative. If it is insufficient, the test may give a green, yellow or red color, depending upon the amount of glucose present. The doctor teaches the patient how to test his own urine and to regulate the dose of insulin depending upon the color of the urine test. From time to time the diabetic patient must also have a glucose test on blood, so as to avoid over dosage of insulin.

The following are other examples of the use of laboratory tests to guide treatment. After an attack of coronary thrombosis, many patients are given drugs to reduce the clotting tendency of their blood. The effect must be precisely controlled by coagulation tests, since overdose of the drug could cause a tendency to hemorrhage.

X-rays, radium and drugs used in the treatment of cancer sometimes destroy blood cells as well as cancer cells; occasional counts must be taken of white cells, red cells and platelets to make sure that this harmful effect is avoided. Some drugs used in the treatment of high blood pressure produce in some patients a condition resembling a special form of sensitivity disease known as lupus eurhythmics,. special blood examinations (“LE prep”) can anticipate this effect.

Transfusions

Of life-saving importance in certain diseases is the use of blood transfusions. However, different people have different types of blood and it would be extremely dangerous to give a patient blood of a type different from his own. To detect these types and determine compatibility between donor’s and recipient’s blood, blood group and Rh tests must be carried out meticulously.

Similar tests (blood group and Rh) are of importance in determining whether the blood of an unborn baby is compatible with that of its mother. If incompatibility is present, it may be necessary to give the baby an “exchange transfusion” immediately after birth.

Frozen Section

The surgeon often calls upon the pathologist to help him decide whether a lump in the breast should be simply removed or whether the whole breast and the nearby lymph nodes should also be removed. This test, known as the “frozen section,” is performed while the patient is under anesthesia. The surgeon removes the lump and passes it to the pathologist who freezes a portion of it in a jet of carbon dioxide gas. Once frozen, a very thin slice or section is cut, stained with a dye, mounted on a glass slide and examined under the microscope. If cancer is present, as determined by the pathologist, the surgeon will normally remove the entire breast and related tissue so as to “get around” the cancer. If the pathologist determines that the lump is benign, the surgeon ordinarily does not remove the remainder of the breast

Behavioral explanations of obesity can be placed into two categories: excessive caloric intake (overeating) and lack of physical activity (hypokinesis).

The basic laws of nature require that calories must be consumed before energy can be stored as excess weight. The body cannot make energy on its own. For the obese and overweight therefore, caloric intake is an important issue.

Do obese people eat more than normal-weight people? This has been a controversial question and researchers are divided in their answer. Numerous studies show that obese people eat no more and sometimes eat less than normal-weight people. These researchers would suggest that blaming obesity on a lack of willpower is inaccurate and an over simplification of the facts. They maintain that the body of the obese person is simply more efficient at converting calories to adipose cells for reasons beyond his or her control, such as genetic predisposition or higher set point for fatness. Stated another way, obese people may not eat more than normal weight people; they just consume more calories than are required by their bodies.

Other researchers claim that obese people do eat more than normal-weight people; the problem is a discrepancy in accurately reporting food intake. In one study obese subjects underestimated food intake by about 50% and overestimated physical activity by 33%. In another study obese women were found to expend and therefore eat about 400 to 500 calories more on average each day than normal-weight women.

Whereas researchers are divided on the issue of overeating, they tend to agree that the abundance of food high in fat and calories is a major factor in the prevalence of obesity in the United States. In his review of the literature on obesity-a review that included 284 citations from the scientific literature Knifeman stated: “Of all the current theories attempting to explain the epidemic of obesity in most Western societies, the high dietary fat intake hypothesis is most widely accepted by experts. Overweight people tend to eat a higher-fat diet than people of normal weight. Ounce for ounce, fat yields more than double the number of calories as protein or carbohydrates . This energy difference partially explains the relationship between dietary fat intake and weight gain. It is not a complete explanation because in studies that hold the total number of calories constant and more calories are consumed than needed, a person eating a high-fat diet tends to store more excess calories as body fat than someone eating a lower-fat diet. Your body is more sensitive to excess carbohydrates than excess fat. Studies conducted in laboratory-type settings (for example, in a respiratory chamber where oxygen is measured, burning calories requires oxygen, more to burn fat, less to burn carbohydrates) show that once the glycogen stores are filled, the body burns carbohydrates first and then stores the fat. We use fat for energy, especially between meals. The brain uses exclusively glucose for energy, but other tissues use fatty acids. Right after meals, all tissues burn glucose.

Excess carbohydrates are converted to glycogen in the liver and muscle. The body can only store a limited amount of glycogen. This is not true for fat. Fat cells are distributed throughout the body. Whereas carbohydrate storage is carefully regulated, fat storage is not, allowing a high degree of expansion. After a large meal, a bit of glucose and amino acids are left over, some of which are used to make fatty acids. This is why the American population has an increasing incidence of obesity on diets high in carbohydrates and excessive in calories. The body’s capacity to make and store fat may have served a useful purpose in earlier times when humans faced the constant threat of famines and an energy reserve meant survival. But now with the sedentary lifestyles of most Americans, glycogen stores are rarely exhausted. The reality for too many people is that they burn carbohydrates and store fat.

Dietary fat also has less of a thermogenic effect than does carbohydrate or protein and can thus be easily stored as adipose tissue. The thermogenic effect of food (TEF) represents the amount of energy required by the body to digest, absorb, metabolize, and store nutrients. The body expends only 3 calories of energy to process 100 calories from fat compared with 25 calories to process 100 calories from carbohydrates. Between 7% and 10% of total body energy goes to support the TEF. For example, after a meal containing 1000 calories, the body uses 70 to 100 calories just to process the meal. The TEF helps to explain why studies consistently show that when adults and children overeat and consume high amounts of dietary fat, they tend to gain weight. Conversely, when the intake of dietary fat is low and the intake of carbohydrate and fiber is high from nutrient-dense foods, desirable body weight is more readily achieved. Cross cultural comparisons confirm the dietary fat-obesity relationship. For example, Americans eat more than twice as much fat as the Chinese, yet the Chinese consume 20% more calories and there is little obesity in China.

Because the energy in carbohydrate stores (glycogen) is very small in relation to that in fat stores, the glycogen can be depleted quickly and frequently. The glucose requirement of the brain, other cells of the nervous system, and a few other tissues provides a stimulus for carbohydrate ingestion. The higher the proportion of fat in the diet, the more total food must be consumed to obtain enough carbohydrates to fill glycogen stores in the muscle and liver.

The high-fat theory of obesity leads to an important question: can a person lose weight by simply focusing on fat calories? In highly controlled studies in which food intake is carefully monitored, researchers found that subjects whose diets contained no more than 20% fat calories lost weight even when there were no restrictions on how much food was eaten. But was the weight loss the result of eating less fat or less calories? The answer seems to be that both fat and calories matter. In controlled studies, when people concentrate on eating less fat they also

Dietary fat promotes fat storage in the body. The body expends only 3 calories to convert an extra 100 calories of dietary fat to storage fat. Fat storage is accelerated if dietary fat is combined with simple sugar in the same meal, such as a ham­burger with a sugared cola drink. Sugar triggers the release of extra insulin. Insulin activates fat cell enzymes that promote movement of fat from the blood to the fat cells. On the other hand, the ingestion of an extra 100 calories of complex carbohydrates requires that the body expend 25 calories to convert it to fat for storage. The conversion process for carbohydrates is more costly than that for fats and provides another reason for reducing fat consumption and increasing carbohydrate consumption.

consume fewer calories and lose weight. This is due to the consumption of mainly nutrient dense foods. Does the same thing happen in real life? Apparently not. Studies of the eating habits of both men and women who consume low-fat products reveal that they often compensate by eating more snack and dessert foods high in sugar but low-fat so the use of low­fat foods becomes an excuse to eat more. The idea that people can eat as much as they want as long as it’s fat free appears to be more fantasy than fact. Although some researchers believe that fat is the main culprit associated with obesity; other experts emphasize that calories count. This helps to explain why Americans are getting heavier with each passing year, even though they are consuming a lower proportion of fat. Increased consumption of low-fat foods by itself does not result in weight loss. Whereas eating low-fat foods is good for health and weight control, eating them in buffet-sized portions isn’t.

In 1995, many women were crest­fallen when a popular over-the­counter contraceptive choice and an FDA-approved product, Today’s sponge, was taken off the market. After an FDA inspection raised concern over the air and water quality in the plant that manufactured the sponge, there were some questions over the potential for an abundance of bacteria, an exposure the FDA felt could have compromised the safety of the product and women who used it. As a result, despite the fact that the product itself still met all FDA standards, the manufacturer halted production due to the prohibitive cost of upgrading the plant in order to pass inspection.

Now under different ownership, Allendale pharmaceutical company has addressed the environmental issues of the plant and plans once again to stock the shelves with, today’s sponge. The product will be no different than its last configuration. It has retained its donut­shape and continues to be coated in nonoxynol-9 spermicide. Its ease of use requires simply inserting it into the vagina and pushing it up to cover the cervix. Removal is equally simple; just pull on the loop, This device can be inserted up to 24 hours before intercourse and does not require repeat applications for repeated intercourse.

The demise of the sponge in 1995 became part of contemporary folklore when it was parodied on the popular television comedy, Seinfeld. When one of the characters, “Elaine,” found herself hoarding the limited supply of sponges still on the shelves, she also began to use it as a basis for rating the romantic potential of men she met. A relationship that had potential was considered to be spongeworthy, which meant Elaine might be willing to dip into her precious supply of sponges at some point. As in many cases, pop culture served as a fair barometer of contemporary society as the show reflected the feelings of many women around the country who felt a real loss when the sponge was no longer produced, Soon there will be no need for anymore hoarding.

Human body is compact whole of organs of senses, brain, heart, lungs, respiratory system, urinary system, skeleton of a bony cage, blood vessels. No other organ can even function in the absence of a perfect digestive system, It is the food, rather a well-balanced and nutritious diet, that (after undergoing various metabolic changes) is required to feed the body. Let us have a close look, as to how our body’s digestive system has to undergo various processes to convert food-intake into a living force or energy to sllstain and nurture it. ‘Food’ accounts or all the edible eatables, including beverages, water, animal and sea products, meats, vegetables etc.

Food is devised to serve the body for discharging its various functions, depending on each person’s physical and work-based requirements. It is a basic principle in Ayurveda that if stomach is not in order, whole system would stand disturbed and further, if one bas got costive bowels (constipation) he will extend invitation to lot of many problems. In Nature cure also, keeping the functioning of stomach normal is a prime requisite and all efforts are directed to achieve the said end. Wrong type of diet is held mainly the cause of many ills of body. In order to rectify the wrongs done to our digestive system, people resort to taking laxatives or purgatives so that toxins are purged from the body.

Digestive Process

Our food consists of sugars, proteins, starches, fats, vitamins, oils and salts. Our system consumes and utilises only a part of the food we ingest and the rest of the useless portion thereof is expelled in the form of excreta and urine, two major excretions of the body in addition, of course, to perspiration of the body. Our teeth break the solid portion of our food into small & tiny parts when, during the course of mastication, saliva gets mixed with it, so that liquefied food is swallowed easily. The more we masticate, more the saliva mixes with the food. Saliva is an alkaline fluid which is secreted and released by salivary glands. Food, gulped down in haste, is neither masticated properly nor does it have advantage of mixing of saliva. Process of digestion of food starts from the mouth itself, from where it enters pharynx which is an expanded cavity behind mouth. Here pharynx is common to food and air passages alike. From there it slips down to the gullet which is a muscular organ and is capable of forcing the food along, as and when necessary. The usual length of gullet is around 9″ and ends up in the stomach. This ends initial stage of digestive process.

Now the food descends into the stomach which is a hollow muscular bag and is lined by a glandular mucus membrane that secrets gastric juice. Gastric juice comprises of salts, pepsin, water and hydrochloric acid. In the stomach, food is mixed and rotated, to render it in more liquefied form so as to absorb above mentioned stomach juices. Now the proteins are changed to such a form that they can pass through the wall of stomach so that it could be absorbed to nourish the system. Proteins and starches, then, get activated, even though not completely digested. Now oil and fat are also broken up to set free the oil. From the stomach the food descends to small intestine which look like a coil that measures 8.62 mtrs more than 20. Thereafter pancreatic juice, intestinal juice and bile mix up with the food which passes through the intestinal wall into lacteal and then spills over to blood.

Small intestine is divided into 3 parts viz.

Duodenam (I part of small intestines) -2.54mts Total

Jefunum (II part of small intestines) -2.43 mtrs length

Ilium (III part of small intestines) -3.65 mtrs 8.62 mtrs

Largest organ of the body is liver which weighs about 3/2 to 2 kgs. It is situated on the right side, under the diaphragm. Liver has within it, fine tubes called Bile Ducts into which bile is secreted by cells of the liver. Hepatic duct is formed by joining together of bile ducts. Now the hepatic duct carries the bile to first part of the small intestine (duodenum). Bile is yellow tinted fluid that contains bile salts and mucus. Bile acts on the fat and oil substances of the food and breaks them into small drops.

Sugar also remains stored in the liver and is gradually released into the blood stream, as and when body requires energy. In diabetes, liver is not in a position to retain sugar and quite often it releases sugar in the blood. Problem is further complicated when the pancreas also fails to release insulin. If liver has sufficient storage capacity and also releases sugar into the blood stream gradually, then the incidence of diabetes is not that grave, but is rendered graver due to insulin deficiency. In addition to insulin pancreas releases other juices that act on the proteins, fats and starches to metabolize, thus aiding further in the process of digestion.

Large intestine is a tube-shaped part, about 1.82 mtrs long and has nothing to do with the digestive process, except retaining residual part (remnants of food) of food for one or two days, after which such residue is expelled (after it hardens in the large intestine for about 24­36 hours) by way of rectum.

The whole process, from ingestion to the stage of expulsion, is carried out in such a smooth and noiseless pattern that we never know as to how faithfully and silently digestive organs of the body discharge their assigned functions in such an amazing and uniform manner. If your diet is well balanced and you neither starve nor overload your system with the food items, that are not suited to your body, you can rarely have a chance to fall ill. If, at all, you fall ill, the intensity and duration of the illness will be negligible and short-lived. On the contrary, dietary indiscreet violations, if continued for a larger period, are bound to spell disaster for you which can manifest in the form of stomach and abdomen pains, loose motions or constipation, acidity or acidic vomiting, with or without nausea/vomiting, gurgling sound, flatulence, locking of gas etc.

Remember, body has immense capacity to absorb human absurdities and irregularities, but it will surely send warning signals initially. If the initial warning signals are ignored, the results can be too horrifying to describe. So, always try to remain within confines of Nature’s laws, because nature’s kindness must never be taken for granted. Sometimes, one has to pay a very heavy price for flouting the laws ‘Of the nature with impunity. Remaining healthy should be your aim and for that your diet must measure up to your various demands on the system. It takes time to regain health. For any illness, let us search within our hearts and try to deduce and pin-point the real cause of malady and, finally, eliminating the basic cause. In most or the cases, it would often be found that the diseased state has surfaced due to wrong use of diet. Diseases relating to sensorium, heart, urinary tract, respiration arc generally attributed to our wrong life-style and ill-placed food habits, resulting in poor and sluggish digestion.